论文部分内容阅读
刑法理论界和司法实务界关于行贿罪中“不正当利益”的认定有四种观点:手段不正当说、非法利益说、不应当得到的利益说和受贿人是否违背职务说。由于受贿人是否违背职务说认定“不正当利益”的范围大小比较恰当,而且操作性较好,又得到了司法解释的支持,因此笔者赞同受贿人是否违背职务说,并提出了“不正当利益”认定的原则。
There are four viewpoints on the identification of “unjust interests” in the crime of bribery by the criminal law and judicial practice circles: improper means of saying that illegal interests say benefits that should not be obtained and whether the bribery runs counter to the duty. Because the bribe violated the duty to say that the scope of the “unjust benefit” is more appropriate, and it is more operant and supported by the judicial interpretation, I agree whether the briber violates the duty and put forward the “unjust benefit ”The principle of determination.