论文部分内容阅读
郑玄《论语注》,以《齐论》、《古论》读正《鲁论》凡五十事。传世与出土文献中保存的“鲁读”注文,仅二十七条、二十八事。笔者以“鲁读”与《定州汉墓竹简论语》相比勘,探讨了简本的《鲁论》性质和抄写时间,提出以《古》正《鲁》,不始于汉末郑玄,竹简《论语》已有了相同的工作。又透过与“鲁读”相关的唐写本郑注同孔安国、马融、包咸注比较,说明郑玄改《鲁》从《古》,是对前人注释的继承。而且郑注既有以《古》正《鲁》,亦有遵《鲁》不从《古》,所以郑注不仅篇章、次第属于《鲁论》,内容、文字也是《鲁论》,只据《古论》校订了部分文字、章句,而非对《鲁论》“重作改编”。
Zheng Xuan “The Analects of Confucius”, “Qi theory”, “ancient theory” is positive “Lu” about 50 things. The “读 读 ” notes kept in the handed down and unearthed documents are only 27 articles and 28 articles. Compared with the “Analects of Bamboo Slips of Dingzhou Han Tombs”, the author discusses the nature of “Lu Lun” and the copy time of the simplified versions, and puts forward that “the ancient” is “Lu” and does not begin with the end of the Han Dynasty Zheng Xuan, Bamboo Slips “The Analects” already have the same job. Through comparison with Kong Anguo, Ma Rong and Bao Xianqin, this paper also shows that Zheng Xuan changed “Lu” from “古” to inherit the annotation of his predecessors. And Zheng Note both the “ancient” is “Lu”, but also comply with “Lu” not from the “ancient”, so Zheng notes not only chapter, second belong to the “Lu”, content, text is also “Lu theory” The ancient theory revised some texts and chapters instead of re-editing Lu.