田亮被游泳中心除名一事现在已成为一个公共事件。有人叹息，有人不平，也有人无所谓。我不想对此事做一个简单的是与非的价值判断，从双方来说，他们这样做也许都有道理，但衍生成目前的这种结果，却是由我们平时被忽视的运动员的产权属性造成的。这是问题的根源所在。看起来，运动员的产权属性是明确的，即属于运动员自己。但举国体制下培养的运动员，无论从理论还是事实上，他都不仅仅属于自己，而首先属于国家，特别是其中 Tian Liang was removed from the swimming center has now become a public event. Somebody sighs, some people are not fair, some people do not matter. I do not want to make a simple right and wrong judgment on the matter. From both sides, they may all make sense. However, the current outcome derived from this is the property rights of athletes we usually neglect Caused. This is the root of the problem. It seems that the property rights of athletes are clear, that is, athletes themselves. However, athletes trained under the nationwide system, not only in theory but also in fact, belong not only to themselves but to the country, especially the