论文部分内容阅读
在我国民事诉讼的审前程序中,被告不答辩并不能产生程序上的不利益。强制答辩制度的缺失给司法实践带来诸多弊端。在厘清不答辩性质的基础上,我国应当建立与举证时限相配套的强制答辩制度。强制答辩的构成要件具体包括适用对象、期限、方式、内容和法律效力,其中否定性法律后果的规定是强制答辩制度的核心内容。考虑到国情,我国不宜规定一刀切的答辩失权制度。对于强制答辩的否定性法律后果,应当根据过错的性质和程度采取不同的制裁,其中有必要确立费用制裁。
In our country’s civil procedure pretrial procedure, the defendant does not reply and can not produce procedural non-interest. The absence of compulsory defense system brings many defects to judicial practice. On the basis of clarifying the nature of non-respondent defense, our country should establish a compulsory defense system that matches the time limit of proof. The constitutional requirements of compulsory defense specifically include the applicable object, duration, method, content and legal effect, of which the provisions of the negative legal consequences are the core content of the compulsory defense system. Given our national conditions, it is not appropriate for our country to stipulate a one-size-fits-all defense of the right of defense. As to the negative legal consequences of compulsory defense, different sanctions should be adopted according to the nature and degree of fault, among which it is necessary to establish cost sanctions.