论文部分内容阅读
在2004年第11期《美术观察》上,登载了彭迪先生的文章《公共性:道义的熔铸》一文,我们姑且不去计较彭迪先生所举的例子能不能算做“公共艺术”,权且把它当作“公共艺术”吧,那就让我们仔细想一下这样的公共艺术,又实施了什么样的权力意志呢?单就彭迪先生所提倡的公共艺术主张而言,我想恐怕没有人反对,我们都期望有一个纯净而道德的空间,让人们都生活得更加幸福、美满。但我们知道,无论“伦理道德”、“社会人格”乃至于“民族精神”都是在时空维度中不断发展、演化的范畴,我想如果把“贞洁牌坊”的形式所负载的伦理道德、社会人格以及民族精神作为今天中国人的行动榜样,恐怕难免让人不敢苟同。
In his article “Art Observations” in the 11th issue of 2004, he published an article entitled “Publicity: Moral Molding” by Mr. Pang Di. Let us not consider whether the example cited by Mr. Pang Di can count as “public art” Let us think carefully about such a public art and what kind of will it is. On the public art advocacy advocated by Mr. Pendy, I think I am afraid No one opposes, and we all expect a pure and moral space for people to live a happier and happier life. However, we know that no matter “ethical morality”, “social personality” or even “national spirit” are all categories that evolve and evolve in the space-time dimension, I think that if the ethics and morality Personality and national spirit as a role model for today’s Chinese people may inevitably make people disagree.