论文部分内容阅读
本文以“存在”作为根本视域,分析了马克思和海德格尔对美和艺术思考的根本差异。对于马克思而言,只有通过感性生产生活,人的感觉才能获得完全的自由和美,然而在海德格尔看来,美是真理自行设入作品,艺术为历史奠基。正是基于存在论的本体论区分,海德格尔批判了马克思的人类学和生产实践论。思考二者对美和艺术思考的根本差异,有助于我们在现时代获得对艺术和生存的思考。
This paper takes “existence ” as the fundamental field of vision to analyze the fundamental differences between Marx and Heidegger’s thinking on beauty and art. For Marx, only through the emotional production of life, human feeling can get complete freedom and beauty, but in Heidegger view, beauty is the truth into their works, art laid the foundation for history. It is precisely ontological distinction based on ontology that Heidegger criticized Marx’s theory of anthropology and production practice. Thinking about the fundamental differences between the two in beauty and thinking of art can help us to gain an idea of art and existence in our time.