论文部分内容阅读
为了了解高校学报现有的办刊模式,探寻高校学报开放办刊的可行性,对17家农业高校学报1991～2000年10年间刊用的外稿比率和基金论文比率进行了实证分析,结果表明:高校学报从1979年起就开始刊用外稿,从所调查的1991年起,17家农业高校学报每期无一例外地刊用了外稿,但高校学报间刊用外稿的比率和基金论文比率存在较大差异,变幅分别为6.8%～42.5%和7.5%～56.0%。1997年以前,非重点大学学报刊用外稿的比率高于重点大学学报的,1997年以后,重点大学学报刊用外稿比率却高于非重点大学学报的;无论是内稿还是外稿,非重点大学学报的基金论文比率均低于重点大学学报的;17家学报所刊用外稿的基金论文比率略低于内稿的,但外稿的增速却快于内稿的;在刊用的外稿中来自研究院所的比率与来自大专院校的相近,但其基金论文比率则高于大专院校的。由此可见,高校学报的办刊方式早已发生了改变,开放办刊已成共识,而且开放程度逐渐增大,在采用外稿时,做到了外稿质量与数量同步提高,外稿来源已从高校拓展到研究院所。
In order to understand the existing running mode of university journals and explore the feasibility of opening journals of journals in colleges and universities, an empirical analysis was conducted on the ratio of manuscripts and fund theses published in journals of 17 agricultural universities in the decade of 1991 to 2000. The results show that : College journals began to publish external manuscripts since 1979. From 1991, 17 journals of agricultural colleges and universities did not exceptionally publish each period, but the proportion of articles and periodicals There is a big difference in the ratio of fund papers, ranging from 6.8% to 42.5% and 7.5% to 56.0% respectively. Prior to 1997, non-key university journals published a higher percentage of articles than the key university journals. Since 1997, journals published in key journals have a higher proportion of external journals than non-key journals; whether in-house or external journals, The ratio of fund papers in non-key university journals was lower than that of key university journals; the ratio of fund papers published in 17 journals was slightly lower than that of internal manuscripts, but the growth rate of external manuscripts was faster than that of internal manuscripts; The contributions from research institutes are similar to those from universities and colleges, but the percentage of fund theses is higher than that of colleges and universities. Thus, we can see that the mode of running journals of colleges and universities has already been changed. The opening and running of journals has become a consensus and the degree of openness has been gradually increasing. When using external manuscripts, the quality and quantity of external manuscripts have been improved synchronously. Colleges and universities to expand research institutes.