论文部分内容阅读
公民在选举权和被选举权受到侵害时或发生争议时,有权通过选举诉讼获得司法救济。随着我国民主与法治进程的深入,自然应当对关系公民重大政治权利的选民资格案件也要倍加关注。选民资格案件不属于非诉案件,但是我国《民事诉讼法》将其纳入非诉案件采用特殊案件审理模式进行审理。但是如果经过诉讼程序之后案件仍然得不到公正有效的审理,是不是作为特殊案件审理模式进行的选民资格案件就应该无奈于一审终审而终结呢?在此,本文就选民资格案件有限二审制作了简要的思考。
Citizens have the right to obtain judicial remedies through election proceedings when the right to vote and the election are violated or disputes arise. With the deepening of the process of democracy and the rule of law in our country, we should also pay more attention to cases of eligibility for voters who have major political rights to citizens. Voter qualification cases do not belong to the non-v. Cases, but China’s “Civil Procedure Law” will be included in non-v. Cases with special case trial mode. However, if the case still can not be dealt with justly and effectively after the procedure, is it not the case of electoral qualification as a special case trial mode that should be ended in the first trial and final adjudication? Here, Brief thinking.