知识产权客体扩张带来了客体保护方式的问题,各国中较广泛的做法是予以反不正当竞争法的保护。财产权模式的保护和反不正当竞争法模式的保护存在很大差别,这种差别是以保护理念的不同为基础的。因此,反不正当竞争法的保护就当然具有了严格适用性。本文指出在保护的合理性方面,不加区分地限制扩张和不加区分地一概予以财产权的保护是两个错误的极端,这在另一方面佐证了区分两种保护模式的必要性。 The expansion of the object of intellectual property has brought about the issue of object protection and the more extensive practice in all countries is the protection against unfair competition law. There is a big difference between the protection of property rights and the protection against unfair competition. The differences are based on the different protection concepts. Therefore, the protection against unfair competition law certainly has strict applicability. The paper points out that in terms of the rationality of protection, the indiscriminate restriction of expansion and the indiscriminate protection of property rights are two erroneous extremes, which on the other hand corroborate the necessity of distinguishing the two modes of protection.