学校侵权责任及其归责原则

来源 :中国教育法制评论 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:dmf625
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
由于学校在实施教育教学活动中承担的是法定义务而非合同义务,在学生伤害事故中,侵害的是学生的人身权,所以学校因违反安全保障义务而造成损害事实时,应承担的是以赔偿损失为主的侵权责任。《侵权责任法》是对分散于不同法律、司法解释中相关规定的系统总结,在责任的归属、构成和分配中体现了其合理性和进步生。根据《侵权责任法》,我国中小学校、幼儿园及其他教育机构的侵权主要适用过错责任原则,过错推定责任原则是其特殊表现形式,而无过错责任原则不适用于学校的侵权行为。 Because the school in the implementation of education and teaching activities to assume the statutory obligations rather than contractual obligations, student injury accidents, infringement of the student’s personal rights, so the school for breach of safety and security obligations caused damage facts, should be borne by the compensation Loss-based tort liability. Tort Liability Act is a systematic summary of the relevant provisions scattered in different laws and judicial interpretations. It reflects its rationality and progress in its ownership, composition and distribution. According to Tort Liability Law, the principle of fault liability is mainly applied to the infringement of primary and secondary schools, kindergartens and other educational institutions in our country. The principle of fault presumption liability is its special form of expression. The principle of no fault liability does not apply to school infringement.
其他文献
一、导论与概念法教义学的概念以及由教义性科学促成的法律之自我理解构成了一种明显和特殊的德语现象。在其他语言中,无论如何也找不到与法教义学直接对应的概念。教义学具
2008年,我国通过开发利用浅层地热能,实现CO2减排1 987×104t。近5年内,我国将在建筑领域加大对地下200 m以内的浅层地热能的开发利用,进一步促进节能减排。截至2009年6月,我