论文部分内容阅读
鉴于传统炒炭法全凭经验掌握,差异很大,不利制定炭药规格质量标准。为确保炭药质量,兹将槐米传统炒炭法改用烤炭法进行实验研究: 实验药材购自上饶市药材批发站。经鉴定为豆科植物槐树sophcra japonica L.的干燥花蕾。分别进行炒炭、烤炭,并进行了鞣质和芦丁的含量测定,以及小鼠出凝血时间的研究,其结果见表1、2、3、4、5。根据槐米烤炭B与炒中炭(1)的外观性状、止血试验及鞣质、芦丁含量测定结果对比,表明160℃烤制4min基本上可代替传统炒炭法。加之槐米烤炭法可定时控温,利于制定质量标准,以保证临床用药准确,且能减轻劳动强度,适应现代机械化大生产。我们认为槐米烤炭法代替传统炒炭法有一定的可行性。
In view of the fact that the traditional method of charcoal-fertilizing is entirely based on experience, there are many differences and it is unfavorable to formulate the quality standards for carbon medicines. In order to ensure the quality of charcoal drugs, the traditional method of investigating charcoal from glutinous rice was changed to experimental charcoal method: The experimental medicinal materials were purchased from the Shangrao City medicinal materials wholesale station. It was identified as a dry bud of the legume Eucalyptus sophcra japonica L. Charcoal and charcoal were separately prepared, and the contents of tannin and rutin were determined, and the time for clotting of mice was studied. The results are shown in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. According to the comparison of appearance characteristics, hemostasis test, and tannin and rutin contents of glutinous rice charcoal B and fried medium charcoal (1), it can be shown that baking at 160°C for 4 minutes can basically replace the traditional method of frying charcoal. In addition, the glutinous rice baking charcoal method can control the temperature at regular intervals, which is conducive to the establishment of quality standards, so as to ensure the accuracy of clinical drug use, as well as to reduce labor intensity and adapt to modern mechanized production. We believe that glutinous rice baking charcoal method has certain feasibility instead of traditional fried charcoal method.