论文部分内容阅读
“我们已经不再有必要为一种明白无误的摄影史的确立而争论了。在学院里,摄影研究作为一个独立的学科已经获得接受。其结果是,(摄影)这个媒介现在已经拥有了一份给予像摄影实践者与热心于摄影这样的人从中获得灵感与身份认同感的官方家谱。”(注1)以上这番话是《意义的争夺——批判的摄影史》(The Contest of Meaning:Critical Histories of Photography)的编者理查德·伯尔顿(Richard Bolton)在此书导论中所说的,时在1989年。
“We are no longer arguing that it is no longer necessary to establish a clear and unambiguous history of photography, in which the study of photography as an independent discipline has been accepted, with the result that the (photographic) medium is now owned An official genealogy that gives inspiration and identification to photography practitioners and people who are passionate about photography. ”1 The above remarks are" The Contest of Consequences - The Contest of the Critical Histories of Photography editor Richard Bolton said in the introduction to the book, in 1989.