论文部分内容阅读
掩護与南海滩撤退的殿後戰、西方强国的比京谈判、艾森豪威尔之被任命为西欧军队最高司令官以及胡佛的警告等等都是西方战略危机的一部份。这是研究北朝鲜战役之战略结论的最适当时期,因为这於西方战略有直接的关系。我们已在朝鲜看到现代战争中的一个决定性战役里以陆军打的,而海空的优势在陆战中并无决定性作用。事实上,北朝鲜战事所考验的并不限於此点,这已表明轻步兵能够战胜高度机械化的和优良装备的西方军队。英国人看清楚并且承认这个可怕的结论。伦敦经济学家周刊朝鲜通讯员於十二月十六日的该刊中直率地说:“一個高度机械化的和装甲的军队正受到一(?)装备低劣的步兵之战略和战术上的打击,无可掩饰地揭破了现代最佳专家的所有理论。”结论是更重要的,因为北朝鲜的中国军队,(按即志愿部队)并没有使用他们所有
Covering the Temple of Heaven retreat in the South Beach, the Bejing negotiations in the Western powers, the appointment of Eisenhower as supreme commander of the Western European Army, and Hoover’s warning are all part of the Western strategic crisis. This is the most appropriate period for studying the strategic conclusion of North Korea’s battle because it has a direct bearing on Western strategy. We have already used the army to fight North Korea in a decisive battle in the modern war, and sea and air superiority have no decisive role in the battle. In fact, the test of North Korea’s war is not limited to this point, which shows that light infantry can defeat the highly mechanized and well equipped Western armies. The British see clearly and acknowledge this terrible conclusion. The North Korean economist weekly North Korea correspondent said in a straightforward manner in the December 16 issue: “A highly mechanized and armored army is being hit by a strategic and tactical attack on a poorly-equipped infantry, and none Can cover up all the theories of modern best experts. ”The conclusion is even more important because the Chinese troops in North Korea,