近闻两则案例,其裁判结果令人尴尬,发人深思。案例一:某公司以其在某银行存入300万元款项、存款期限届满某银行拒付为由,向某中级人民法院提起存单纠纷诉讼,诉请判令某银行支付存款。该院遂判令支持某公司的诉请。某银行上诉,某高级人民法院以原审判决认定事实不清,适用法律有误为由,将该案发回重审。某中级人民法院遂制作了一份通知书送达双方当事人。该通知书内容为:某市公安局来函认为,本案系一起金融诈骗案,案情复杂,涉案金额巨大,犯罪手段特别,涉案嫌疑人多,且主要嫌疑人在逃,正在立案侦查。因为有经济犯罪嫌疑,根据最高人民法院《关于在审理经济纠纷案件中涉及经济犯罪嫌疑若干问题的规定》第12条之规定,通知如下:本案移送某公安局侦查处理;本案案件受理费退还某公司。案例二:多年前,某甲委托一中介帮其购买两套住房,该中介将其 Two cases of recent news, its referee results embarrassing, thought-provoking. Case 1: A company filed a deposit dispute with a mid-level court on the ground that a bank deposited 3 million yuan in a bank and a bank refuses to pay when the deposit term expires, and requests a bank to make a deposit. The hospital was ordered to support a company's petition. A bank appeal, a higher people's court to determine the trial verdict unclear facts, applicable law is wrong, the case will be remanded. A mid-level people's court then made a notice served on both parties. The circular reads: A letter from the Municipal Public Security Bureau believed that the case was a financial fraud case, the case was complex, involved a huge amount of money, a special means of crime, many suspects involved, and the main suspects are at large and are now investigating the case. Because of economic suspects, according to Article 12 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Suspicion of Economic Crimes in the Trial of Economic Disputes, the notice is as follows: The case was transferred to a public security bureau for investigation and handling; In this case, the acceptance fee was refunded the company. Case two: Years ago, a commissioned an intermediary to help them buy two sets of housing, the intermediary will be