最近,在学术界,特别是在青年学者们中间,流传着一个不太令人振奋的说法,叫做“活跃的文学、沉闷的史学、幼稚的法学、危机的哲学、混乱的经济学”。除了文学,对其他请人文、社会科学学科的评价颇为尖刻,甚至有“厚此薄彼”之嫌。经济学而外,我知之不多,不敢妄断。仅就经济学而言,其学科发展中的纷然杂 Recently, there has been a less exciting statement circulated among academics, especially among young scholars, as “active literature, boring history, naive jurisprudence, crisis philosophy, chaotic economics.” In addition to literature, the evaluation of other humanities and social sciences is rather sharp, and there is even a suspicion of “being indifferent”. Economics, I know little, afraid to jump off. Only in terms of economics, the development of its disciplines mixed