论文部分内容阅读
1999年4月,某县公安局刑警大队副队长王某(党员),负责承办张某、谷某等人涉嫌盗掘古墓葬犯罪案件时,张某之父为减轻其子罪行与谷某之妻协商,每人出2000元送王某疏通说情。谷某之妻同意后便持4000元现金通过他人私下送给了王某,王某收到现金后,便对张、谷二人各进行罚款5500元和4500元治安罚款结案释放。所罚10000元王某未予上交,而直接用于队内各项开支。2001年7月,县公安局以原涉嫌盗掘古墓犯罪将张某、谷某进行刑事拘留。王某发觉事情将要暴露,便用队里的其他罚款10000元上缴到本局法制科,并以法制科收取保证金的形式给张、谷二人补开了收据。同时又将4000元现金退还给了谷某之妻。对王某的行为应如何定性处理?
In April 1999, Wang County, the deputy captain of a police brigade in a county public security bureau, was responsible for contracting Zhang Mou and Gu Mou and others in connection with the crime of digging ancient tombs. Zhang's father, in order to ease his son's crime, Consultation, 2,000 yuan each to send Wang to clear the affection. Gu Moumou wife agreed to hold 4,000 yuan in cash through privately sent to Wang, Wang received Zhang, Gu, Zhang and Gu each fined 5500 yuan and 4500 yuan security fine closed. The penalty of 10,000 yuan Wang did not pay, but directly for the team's expenses. In July 2001, the County Public Security Bureau criminally detained Zhang and Gu Mou in connection with the crimes of illegally excavating the tomb. Wang found things to be exposed, they use the team's other fines of 10,000 yuan turned over to the Legislative Branch of this Bureau, and the legal department to collect the bond in the form of Zhang, Gu two fill out the receipt. At the same time will be 4,000 yuan in cash returned to Valley's wife. Wang's behavior should be how to deal with qualitative?