论文部分内容阅读
今年3月,三名流窜犯罪嫌疑人在光天化日之下,潜入南京某大厦11楼的一位陈先生的家中盗窃,窃走人民币4000元,并撬坏门锁两把,抽屉锁两把。陈先生认为自己已与负责管理大厦的物业管理公司签订了物业管理服务合约,现失窃了,就是物业管理公司失职,应该给自己赔偿损失。于是一纸诉状把物业管理公司告到了法院。法院对此案进行了审判,法院认为根据《南京市物业管理暂行办法》,物业管理公司为物业使用人提供的保安、清扫保洁等服务应是公共服务,虽
In March of this year, three criminal suspects fleeing into the home of a Mr. Chen who was on the 11th floor of a building in Nanjing were stolen for 4,000 yuan and prized two broken door locks and two drawer locks in broad daylight. Mr Chan thinks he has signed a property management service contract with the property management company responsible for managing the building. Now he is stolen, that is, the property management company is derelict from duty and should compensate himself for the loss. So a paper complaint to the property management company sued the court. The court tried the case. The court held that according to the Provisional Measures of Nanjing Municipality on Property Management, the property management companies should provide public security services and cleaning cleaning services to property users. Although the public service should be provided,