论文部分内容阅读
人生的目的和意义是什么?这是年青人喜欢探索的一个哲学问题。近几年来,我国青年对这个问题进行了热烈的讨论,提出了各种各样的见解。其中“主观为自己,客观为别人”的观点在许多青年中很有影响,有的人甚至把它捧为“社会主义现阶段最合理的人生观”。这种观点有些什么根据?这些根据是否能够成立?很有必要讨论清楚。 提出“主观为自已,客观为别人”的人认为,“人的本性是自私的,世界上没有人能够例外”,“人在实现自私目的的行动中,客观上也为别人服务着”。这就是说,只要主观上为自己,客观上就一定可以为别人;为自己的主观动机与为别人的客观效果之间有着必然的、完全一致的关系。这种看法,不符合马克思主义关于动机和效果辩证关系的观点,也不符合
What is the purpose and meaning of life? This is a philosophical question that young people like to explore. In recent years, our youth have held heated discussions on this issue and put forward various opinions. The view that “subjectivity is for oneself and objectivity is for others” is influential in many young people. Some people even hold it as “the most reasonable outlook on life at the present stage of socialism.” What is the basis for such a view? Whether these bases can be established? It is necessary to discuss clearly. The proponents of “subjectivism as self and objectivity as others” think that “man’s nature is selfish, and no one in the world can make an exception.” “In the act of selfish purpose, man serves objectively others.” That is to say, as long as the subjective is itself, it can certainly be objectively objective for others; there is a necessary and completely consistent relationship between its own subjective motivation and the objective effect of others. This view is inconsistent with the Marxist view of the dialectical relationship between motivation and effectiveness, nor does it conform to