论文部分内容阅读
关于蔡元培的《说民族学》一文,学界多强调其所厘清的“民族学”之学科内容,而甚少探讨蔡氏所阐述的民族学研究在中国具有的意义或功能。蔡元培的民族学观影响了中央研究院民族学组的学术规划,中研院民族学者凌纯声的研究中的古史辨视角与文化实践内容即具体呈现蔡氏眼中的民族学之意义。这一研究视角既能为我们综合理解民国民族学提出另一个思路,也为我们整体地看待人类学、民族学学科建设提供历史的参照。
On Cai Yuanpei’s article “Ethnology”, scholars pay more attention to the content of “Ethnology” which is clarified and seldom discuss the significance or function of ethnology research described by Chua in China. Cai Yuanpei’s view of ethnology affected the academic planning of ethnology group of Academia Sinica. The historical perspective and cultural practice in the study of Ling Chun-sang, a scholar of the Academia Sinica, embodied the significance of ethnology in Chua’s eyes. This research perspective not only provides us with a new way of thinking for our comprehensive understanding of the ethnology of the Republic of China, but also provides a historical reference for our overall view of anthropology and ethnology.