论文部分内容阅读
自发组织的自助游是具有高度自由性的新兴旅游方式,这种自助游并不是一种法律行为,而是一种情谊行为,纠纷发生后应该在侵权法中寻找救济。该种自助游的组织者负有安全保障义务,但是该组织者并不属于《侵权责任法》第37条规定的组织者的范畴,因此不能适用《侵权责任法》第37条的规定,而应该根据《侵权责任法》第6条第1款关于过错责任的一般规定解决纠纷。在确定自助游组织者违反安全保障义务的侵权责任时必须符合一般侵权责任的四个构成要件,自助游组织者也可以受害人过错、第三人过错、不可抗力进行抗辩。
Spontaneous organized self-help travel is a highly innovative emerging tourism, this self-help travel is not a legal act, but a kind of friendship behavior, the dispute should be found in relief after the tort law. This kind of self-help travel organizer has the obligation of security, but the organizer does not belong to the scope of the organizer as stipulated in Article 37 of the Tort Liability Act, therefore, the provisions of Article 37 of the Tort Liability Act can not be applied. Disputes should be resolved in accordance with the general provisions on liability for fault in article 6, paragraph 1, of the Tort Liability Act. In determining the tour organizers infringement of safety and security obligations must comply with the four elements of the general tort liability, travel organizers can also fault the victim, the third person fault, force majeure to defend.