论文部分内容阅读
我国现有的非法证据排除制度,较好的保障了遭受非法取证侵害的当事人的利益,却未能平衡原本享有正当利益的当事人的权益,结合民事诉讼的目的,应在现有国情的基础上,吸收借鉴域外的合理经验,通过利益衡量和举证责任分配来明确我国民事证据排除的具体应用,以及完善前置程序——当事人证据调查制度,来调和非法手段与正当目的矛盾,更好的实现法律的保障和导向价值。
The existing exclusionary system of illegal evidence in our country better protects the interests of the parties who have been subjected to illegal forensics and fails to balance the rights and interests of the parties that originally enjoyed legitimate interests. Based on the existing national conditions, , Learn from outside the reasonable experience, through the interests of the burden of proof and burden of proof to determine the specific application of our civil evidence exclusion, as well as improve the pre-procedure - the parties evidence investigation system to reconcile the contradictions between illegal means and legitimate purposes, to achieve better Legal protection and guiding value.