调查分析了《中华结核和呼吸杂志》审稿人对公开审稿人身份的态度。发现72.6%的审稿人认为杂志没有必要公开审稿人的身份,认为随着社会开放程度的不断提高今后肯定和有可能公开审稿人身份的分别占20.1%和45.1%,认为今后肯定不会公开审稿人身份的占34.8%。对公开审稿人身份的可能性以及提高审稿的质量和公正性进行了讨论。 The survey analyzed the attitude of the reviewers of “China Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases” to the status of public reviewers. Found that 72.6% of reviewers think there is no need for magazines to openly review the status of reviewers, and that with the continuous improvement of social openness, 20.1% and 45.1% of the reviewers are likely to identify as public reviewers in the future, respectively, 34.8% will be public reviewers. The possibility of public examiners being identified and the quality and impartiality of reviewers were discussed.