对比分析齐玉苓案和罗彩霞案件表明,罗彩霞的遭遇与齐玉苓的遭遇基本一致,均是由被告以侵犯姓名权为手段侵犯受教育权。案件不同之处在于受案范围不同。两案的比较分析对于完善教育法律部门,继而完善我国部门法体系都具有积极的实效意义。 The comparative analysis of the case of Qi Yu-ling and Luo Caixia shows that the encounter with Luo Caixia is basically the same as the encounter with Qi Yuling, both of which violated the right to education by infringing the name of the accused. The difference lies in the scope of the case. The comparative analysis of the two cases has a positive and practical significance for improving the education legal department and then improving the departmental law system of our country.