论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察中医辨证联合外治法治疗小儿肺炎的效果及安全性。方法:选择肺炎患儿76例,按照入院顺序分为观察组和对照组。观察组在西医治疗基础上予以中医辨证治疗联合外治方法进行治疗,对照组则只予以西医进行治疗。结果:观察组患儿在热退时间、咳嗽消失时间、罗音消失时间和治疗天数都明显低于对照组,数据差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的中医症候急性期疗效(97.36%)明显优于对照组(94.73%),两组数据差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的中医症候恢复期疗效(97.36)明显优于对照组(76.31%),两组数据差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的治疗总疗效(97.36%)明显优于对照组(86.84%),两组数据差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中医分期辨证治疗措施联合外治方法治疗小儿肺炎后期临床效果良好,且无任何伴随性并发症的发生,安全性良好,值得广泛推广应用。
Objective: To observe the effect and safety of syndrome differentiation and syndrome differentiation combined with external treatment in treating children with pneumonia. Methods: 76 children with pneumonia were selected and divided into observation group and control group according to admission sequence. On the basis of western medicine treatment, the observation group was treated with TCM syndrome differentiation combined with external treatment and the control group only treated with western medicine. Results: The observation group of children in the heat back time, cough disappear time, rales disappear time and treatment days were significantly lower than the control group, the data was statistically significant difference (P <0.05). The effect of traditional Chinese medicine symptom in observation group (97.36%) was significantly better than that in control group (94.73%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). The recovery rate of TCM symptom in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (97.36) (76.31%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). The total curative effect of the observation group was 97.36%, which was significantly better than that of the control group (86.84%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: TCM syndrome differentiation treatment combined with external treatment of pediatric pneumonia in the late clinical results are good, and without any incidental complications, good safety, it is widely used.