论文部分内容阅读
《刑法修正案(八)》对我国现行刑法规定的盗窃罪进行了较大的修改。特别是将入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃三种行为方式和多次盗窃、盗窃数额较大的相并列。目前不论是刑法理论界还是司法实践,对于入户盗窃和扒窃的认定并没有多大的争议,但对于如何认定携带凶器盗窃,刑法学界争议却比较大,并且严重影响了司法实践的认定。因此,本文从刑法学界对携带凶器盗窃的争议出发,提出自己浅薄的见解,希望能对司法实践的认定提供一点帮助。
The Amendment to the Criminal Law (8) makes great changes to the theft in China’s current criminal law. Especially in the home theft, carrying the murder of theft, pickpocketing three acts and multiple theft, theft of larger phase. At present, no matter whether it is criminal law theory or judicial practice, there is not much controversy about the identification of home theft and pickpocketing. However, there is much controversy over how to identify the crime of carrying the weapon, which has seriously affected the determination of judicial practice. Therefore, this article from the criminal law academia on carrying the weapon of theft controversy, put forward their own shallow views, hoping to identify the judicial practice to provide a little help.