论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨口腔种植修复与传统固定桥修复在牙列缺损治疗中的应用价值。方法本研究对象为2014年3月至2016年3月于广西壮族自治区民族医院就诊的86例牙列缺损患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组,每组43例。对照组患者行传统固定桥修复,观察组患者行口腔种植修复,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组患者治疗总有效率为97.7%;明显高于对照组的83.7%;并发症发生率为4.7%;明显低于对照组的18.6%,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);观察组患者对治疗后语言功能、咀嚼功能、稳定性、舒适度、美观度的满意度评分均明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论在牙列缺损治疗中,与传统固定桥修复相比,口腔种植修复治疗可取得更理想的修复效果,牙齿健康情况明显改善,且患者发生并发症风险较低。
Objective To investigate the value of oral implants restoration and traditional fixed bridge repair in the treatment of dentition defect. Methods This study was performed on 86 cases of dentition defect patients from March 2014 to March 2016 in National Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. According to the random number table, they were divided into control group and observation group, with 43 cases in each group. Control group of patients underwent traditional fixed bridge repair, observation group patients underwent oral implant repair, the treatment effect of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 97.7%, significantly higher than that of control group 83.7%, complication rate 4.7%, significantly lower than that of control group 18.6% (all P <0.05) ; The satisfaction scores of the patients in the observation group after treatment with language function, masticatory function, stability, comfort and aesthetics were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional fixed bridge repair, dental implants repair can achieve more satisfactory repair effect in dentition defect treatment, the dental health is significantly improved, and the risk of complications is lower.