人们对章太炎《春秋左传读续录》的评价现象中存在一个较大的误区,即往往承袭承袭俞樾的观点而断之为“穿凿”。但诸多例证表明章氏《续录》之论有理有据、平允公正,而与之名称颇为相似的《春秋左传读》中不少观点未免迂曲无据,反生穿凿。诸祖耿在转述章氏观点之时,似已将二书混淆。 There is a big misunderstanding in the appraisal of Zhang Taiyan’s “Spring and Autumn Chuanxu continued recording”, which often inherits the view of Yu Yue and breaks it into “puncturing”. However, many examples show that Zhang’s theory of “sequel” is well-founded and fair, and quite a lot of views in the book “The Spring and Autumn Annals of the Spring and Autumn” are quite unnecessary and unnecessary. When Zhuzu Geng quoted Zhang’s point of view, it seems confusing the two books.