论文部分内容阅读
都是公司治理缺失惹的祸。葛柏越持有公司70%的股权,却失去对公司的控制权,不免让人匪夷所思:控股的目的何在?何况他本人还是一家上市公司的董事长。我们不免质疑这个案例的真实性,在当下社会中,依然还有如此滑稽的景况、令人啼笑皆非的故事。但案例中各种当事人行为的发生,不得不让人深思如下问题。控股权与控制权匹配吗?所有权与经营权分离是现代公司的重要特征,也是企业做大做强的迫切需要。在企业
All are blame for lack of corporate governance. Ge Boshu holds 70% stake in the company, but lost control of the company, can not help but make people incredible: what is the purpose of holding? Moreover, he himself is a listed company’s chairman. We can not help but question the authenticity of this case. In the present society, there are still such ridiculous stories as ridiculous stories. However, the occurrence of various parties in the case occurred, people have to ponder the following questions. Does the controlling right match with the controlling right? The separation of ownership and management right is an important feature of the modern company and an urgent need of the enterprise to become bigger and stronger. In business