论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比观察即刻种植与延迟种植的临床疗效。方法:选取2013年6月~2014年6月我院收治的牙齿缺失患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为实验组和对照组各30例,实验组采取即刻种植的口腔种植方法,对照组则施以延迟种植手术;随访24个月,对比两组的种植成功率、种植体稳定系数(ISQ)、术后不良反应及患者满意度。结果:对照组和实验组在种植成功率、ISQ及术后不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组在治疗效果、美观度满意度方面差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05),而在治疗过程的满意度方面,实验组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:即刻种植和延迟种植的临床疗效相当,但即刻种植在治疗过程方面具有一定的优势。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of immediate implant and delayed implant. Methods: Totally 60 patients with tooth loss admitted to our hospital from June 2013 to June 2014 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group (n = 30). The experimental group received immediate implanting method and the control group The patients underwent delayed planting operation. The follow-up was 24 months. The success rate of implantation, implant stability index (ISQ), postoperative adverse reactions and patient satisfaction were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between the control group and the experimental group in the success rate of implantation, the incidence of ISQ and postoperative adverse reactions (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the therapeutic effect and the degree of aesthetic satisfaction (P> 0.05). However, in the satisfaction of the treatment process, the experimental group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate and delayed implantations have comparable clinical outcomes, but immediate implant has some advantages in the treatment process.