论文部分内容阅读
美国从Daubert案开始,不断完善《联邦证据规则》对专家证词采纳标准的规定,并借助《联邦民事诉讼规则》中的即决判决对专家证词进行甄别,赋予法官筛选符合标准的专家证词的权限,以保障反垄断诉讼正常进行。我国在专家证词采纳方面仍是空白,美国的经验可为我国制定反垄断民事诉讼中专家证词采纳标准提供有益借鉴。
Starting with the Daubert case, the United States continuously perfected the Federal Rules of Evidence on the adoption of standards for expert testimony and scrutinized expert testimony with summary judgments in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, giving judges the power to screen qualified experts for testimony , In order to protect the normal antitrust litigation. Our country still lacks in the aspect of adopting expert testimony, and the experience of the United States can provide useful reference for our country to formulate standards for testimony of experts in antitrust civil litigation.