论文部分内容阅读
目的探究在直肠癌进行治疗的过程中,使用腹腔镜直肠癌Miles术与传统Miles术临床效果。方法对收治于汤阴县人民医院2014年2月到2016年6月间的80例直肠癌患者随机均分为两组;其中40例直肠癌患者使用传统Miles术治疗,并归为对照组,针对另外40例患者采用腹腔镜直肠癌Miles术,并归为观察组。结果观察组患者的手术时间和对照组无明显差异,但手术的出血少于对照组,同时手术后排气时间和手术后住院时间均短于对照组;观察组患者的并发症发生率7.5%明显低于对照组(20.0%),组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜直肠癌Miles术与传统Miles术治疗直肠癌,均能够对患者起到一定的治疗效果,但是腹腔镜直肠癌Miles术能够减小对于患者的创伤,利于患者恢复,因此值得临床借鉴。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of using Miles operation and traditional Miles operation in laparoscopic rectal cancer in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods Twenty patients with rectal cancer admitted to the People’s Hospital of Tangyin County from February 2014 to June 2016 were randomly divided into two groups. Forty patients with rectal cancer underwent traditional Miles operation and were assigned to the control group. Another 40 patients underwent Laparoscopic Miles Miles surgery, and classified as observation group. Results There was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group in the operation time, but the bleeding in operation was less than that in the control group. The postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay after operation were shorter than those in the control group. The complication rate in the observation group was 7.5% Which was significantly lower than that of the control group (20.0%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic Miles surgery and Miles treatment can play a certain therapeutic effect on patients with rectal cancer. However, Miles surgery can reduce the trauma to patients and facilitate the recovery of patients, so it is worth to be referred to.