论文部分内容阅读
我国银行承兑汇票结算制度在无严格法律规范的情况下刚刚起步,即在纠纷案件审理中陷入无所适从的状况。笔者想通过自己代理的几起银行承兑汇票纠纷案,就目前人民法院在审理银行承兑汇票纠纷案中几个带普遍性的问题以及如何解决这些问题提出自己的观点。一、关于案件管辖问题民事诉讼法第27条规定:“因票据纠纷提起的诉讼,由票据支付地或者被告住所地人民法院管辖。”第24条规定:“因合同纠纷提起的诉讼,由被告住所地或者合同履行地人民法院管辖。”由于银行承兑汇票案件法律关系的特殊性,各地人民法院在受理银行承兑汇票纠纷案时,在如何适用民诉法该两条管辖规定时有不同的认识,甚至出现一案两立,判决结果大相径庭的情况。造成人民法院审理银行承兑汇票纠纷案管辖冲突的原因,在于一份银行承兑汇票涉及四种以上不同法律关系。
China’s bank acceptance draft settlement system has just started without strict legal norms, that is, in the trial of disputes in a panicked situation. I would like to pass my own case of bank acceptance bill dispute, on the current trial of bank acceptance bill dispute in several cases with the most common problems and how to solve these problems put forward their own views. First, on the jurisdiction of the case Article 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides: “litigation due to disputes over bills of exchange, the place of payment of the bill or the people’s court of the place of residence of the defendant. ” Article 24 states: "litigation due to contract disputes Due to the peculiarities of the legal relationship in the case of bank acceptance bills, when accepting the bank acceptance bill dispute, the people’s courts all over the People’s Republic of China have jurisdiction over the application of these two provisions of the Civil Procedure Law There are different understandings and even situations where the result of the judgment is very different from one case to another. The reason for causing people’s courts to handle jurisdictional conflicts in bank acceptance bills disputes lies in the fact that a bank acceptance bill involves more than four different legal relationships.