论文部分内容阅读
今天谁都不能否认知识在经济社会发展中的战略地位.但是我们却不赞同西方学者提出的“知识价值论”.由于这种理论流行于世,就更有加以科学分析的必要,以便在这种分析比较中更好地坚持马克思主义的劳动价值论.美国社会学家奈斯比特在他的《大趋势》一书中写道:“在信息经济社会里,价值的增长不是通过劳动,而是通过知识实现的.‘劳动价值论’诞生于工业经济的初期,必将被新的‘知识价值论’所取代.” 马克思劳动价值论最主要之点,就是它揭示了人类抽象劳动创造商品价值这一客观真理.用“知识价值论” 取代劳动价值论,无疑是认为创造商品价值的不再是人的抽象劳动,而是知识了.什么是知识?知识是人们在改造世界的反复实践中所获得的认识和经验的总和.如果我们把人类劳动创造的物质产品
No one today can deny the strategic position of knowledge in economic and social development, but we do not agree with the “theory of value of knowledge” proposed by Western scholars. Because this theory prevailed, there was a need for scientific analysis in order to In a comparative analysis, Marxism's labor theory of value is better adhered to. “American social scientist Naisbitt wrote in his book” The Great Trend, “that in the information-economy society, the growth of value is not through labor, Is realized through knowledge.'Labor value theory 'was born in the early stage of industrial economy and will surely be replaced by a new' theory of knowledge value '. ”The most important point of Marx's labor theory of value is that it reveals that human abstract labor creates goods Value of this objective truth.With the “value of knowledge” to replace the labor theory of value, it is undoubtedly that the creation of the value of goods is no longer human abstract labor, but knowledge.What is knowledge? Knowledge is the people in the reform practice of the world In the sum of knowledge and experience gained.If we put human labor to create the physical product