论文部分内容阅读
众所周知,国际社会与国内社会的最大差异在于国际政治的无政府状态。因此,从历史和现实的经验看,可以说,国际社会是个最需要伦理规范的地方,但又是最难实现公平正义的地方。那么,探究国际伦理问题究竟有没有意义?在国际政治中到底有没有伦理道德的位置?与此相关的问题还有,指导人与人之间关系的一般道德原则是否同样适用于国家间关系?总而言之,国家间伦理(国际伦理)乃至超国家的全球伦理是否必要以及是否可能?对这些问题,国际关系理论的两大流派即现实主义和自由主义作出了截然不同、相互对立的回答。自由主义者,对这个问题作出了肯定的回
As we all know, the biggest difference between the international community and the domestic one is the anarchy of international politics. Therefore, from historical and realistic experience, it can be said that the international community is the place most in need of ethical norms, but it is also the most difficult place to achieve fairness and justice. Is there any significance in exploring the issue of international ethics? Is there any ethical position in international politics? The relevant question is whether the general moral principles that govern the relationship between people apply equally to the relations between nations? To sum up, is it necessary and even possible for a global ethic between nations (ethical) and even supranational? To these questions, the two schools of international relations theory, Realism and Liberalism, make completely different and opposite answers. Liberals made a positive return to this question