据不完全统计,全国有科学副刊的报纸不下百家,每位科学副刊的责任编辑有个共同的心愿:在自己负责的版面上,把最新的科学知识介绍给读者。但由于编辑对“新知识”的标准掌握不一,在有的科学副刊上往往出现不受读者欢迎的文章。有些编辑取舍稿件以“我”为中心,把自己闻所未闻的知识,误以为是新知识,而介绍给读者。读者看到这些“老掉牙”、“炒冷饭”的知识,却无不为之摇头。由此可见,科学副刊编辑在组稿和取舍稿件时,掌握衡量“新知识”的标准至关重要。笔者根据自己多年来编辑科学副刊的体会,认为在取舍稿件时,从以下几点掌握和衡量“新知识”的标准很重要。新发现、新发明、新创造的知识。当今世界,科学技术迅猛发展,新学科、新知识、新发明不断涌现,有人作过统计:20世纪60年代在自然科学领域中的新发现、发明项目,已超过了以往两千年的总和,这说明可供科学副刊报道的内容有许许多多,关键是选择发表的“火候”。见报的时机选择恰当,可起到事半功 According to incomplete statistics, there are no fewer than 100 newspapers in the country that have scientific supplements. Each responsible editor of science supplements has a common wish: to introduce readers with the latest scientific knowledge on their own responsible forums. However, due to the different masters of editors’ standards of “new knowledge”, some articles that are not popular with readers often appear in some scientific supplements. Some editors choose the manuscript to “I” as the center, mistaken for the knowledge of their own unheard of, and introduced to the reader. Readers see these “old teeth”, “fried rice” knowledge, but all are shaking their heads. This shows that it is of paramount importance for the editors of scientific supplements to master the criteria for measuring “new knowledge” when grouping and selecting contributions. According to my experience in editing scientific supplements for many years, I think it is very important to grasp and measure the standard of “new knowledge” from the following points when choosing manuscripts. New discoveries, new inventions, newly created knowledge. In today’s world, with the rapid development of science and technology, new disciplines, new knowledge and new inventions are constantly emerging. Some people have made statistics: the new discoveries and inventions in natural sciences in the 1960s exceeded the sum of the two thousand years in the past, There are so many explanations that we can cover the contents of the science supplement, the key is to choose published “heat.” See the timing of the newspaper to choose the right, can play half work