论文部分内容阅读
《墨子·兼爱》和《庄子·齐物论》在语用上具有一定的可比性。综览二者的语篇分布特征和总体疑问标记,藉此可初步管窥二者致思理路之异同,还可借助疑问语气词这一颇具口语色彩的语用标记为《史记》语焉不详的墨子里籍等历史文化问题提供实证性佐证。其次,《墨子·兼爱》和《庄子·齐物论》的问句组合形式可以形成句式、语气、话轮等方面的错综。组合问内部问句之间有对比、解说、递进等语义关联。
“Mozi and love” and “Zhuangzi Qiwu theory” in the pragmatic has a certain comparability. This paper reviews the discourse distribution and the overall question mark of the two texts, so as to give an initial insight into the similarities and differences between the two ways of thinking, and can also make use of the interrogative modality of the colloquial term “Moji” Li Ji and other historical and cultural issues provide empirical evidence. Secondly, the combination of questions between “Mozi and Love” and “Zhuangzi and Qiwu Theory” can lead to intricacy in the aspects of sentence pattern, tone of voice and turn of speech. There are contrasts, explanations, and progressive semantic relations among the inter-question questions.