论文部分内容阅读
关于《司马芳残碑》的研究,多年来一直都未曾间断,由于该碑碑文残缺严重,无法完整显现记载的全部内容。此外,对此碑的记载亦是少之又少,这些成为判断、理解和研究此碑的制约因素。从现有的研究结果看,争议主要集中在刻碑的历史断代方面。面对这种情况,我们试从碑文书法方面进行思考,以期对研究有所启发和帮助。本文以《司马芳残碑》的书法异同为例对由隶到楷的字体演变,进行对比介绍,旨在
The research on “Simafang Canbei” has not been interrupted for many years. Due to the seriousness of the inscription, it is impossible to fully display the recorded contents. In addition, there are few records of this monument, which have become the limiting factor in judging, understanding and studying this monument. Judging from the existing research results, the controversies mainly focus on the historical dynasties of carvings. Faced with this situation, we try to think in terms of inscriptions calligraphy, with a view to inspire and help research. This article uses the similarities and differences of calligraphy of Sima Fang’s Residual Stewart as an example to introduce the fonts evolved from Li to Kai.