论文部分内容阅读
目的：比较并分析两种手术方法治疗胸骨骨折的疗效。方法选择我院在2014年1月到2016年2月收治的158例胸骨骨折患者作为本研究的研究对象，将所有患者随机方法划分为观察组和对照组，对照组80例，观察组78例，对照组采用传统的钢丝固定法治疗，采用颈椎前路锁定加压钢板内固定法进行治疗，比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组患者和对照组患者的治疗有效率存在明显差异，两组比较，P＜0.05，具有统计学意义；对两组患者的手术情况进行比较，观察组患者的术中出血量更少，手术时间和住院时间更短，结束后两组患者所出现的不良反应和并发症情况相比，差异明显，P＜0.05，具有统计学意义。结论临床上对于胸骨骨折患者，采用颈椎前路锁定加压钢板内固定方法进行治疗，能够取得更加明显的效果，可有效促进患者的恢复，减少不良反应的发生率，安全可靠，具有临床推广使用的价值。,Objective Comparison and analysis of two kinds of surgical treatments of stal fracture results.Methods Our hospital in January 2014 to February 2016 treated 158 patients with stal fracture as the object of this study, all the patients were randomly divided into study group and control group, 80 patients in the control group, 78 patients in the observation group, control group used traditional steel wire ifxation used anterior cervical vertebra locking compression plate intal ifxation to treat, compared two groups of patients in treatment.Result Observing efifciency than the control group and treatment group, P<0.05, signiifcant differences was statistically signiifcant. Observe the Group’s operation and complications than the control group, P<0.05, signiifcant differences was statistically signiifcant.Conclusion Tibial spinal anterior locking compression plate intal ifxation for treatment of fracture of the stum better, worthy of promotion.