如果把法教义学的态度运用到极致,而不对规范成立的事实结果投以苛求的目光,或者干脆把某种实践性的动机隐入规范解读的价值判断之中,那么在本次修宪中,则可依稀读出某种互惠正义。正义的面孔很多,博登海默就曾说正义有着“一张普洛透斯似的脸”。在那林林总总的正义形态中,互惠正义的观念及其实效性几乎跟“报应正义”一样古老,因为在法学的理解中,二者恰好构成对立。当然,互惠正义的观念也和其他正义一 If we apply the principle of legal doctrine to the extreme without putting a demanding eye on the factual result of the establishment of the norm or simply implicitly putting a practical motivation into the value judgments of normative interpretation, , You can vaguely read out some kind of reciprocity justice. There are many righteous faces, and Bodenheimer once said that justice has “a Proteus-like face.” In that plethora of righteous forms of righteousness, the notion of reciprocal justice and its effectiveness are almost as old as “retributive justice,” because in the understanding of jurisprudence they are just the opposite. Of course, the concept of reciprocal justice is also one with other justice