目的对比两种方法治疗小儿脑瘫并精神发育迟滞的效果及效／价比。方法两种均以手法为基础，配合康复训练，Ａ组脑活素等静脉点滴，３０ｄ　为１个疗程；Ｂ组脑活素等穴位注射，配合针刺（头针、体针），２０ｄ　为１个疗程。结果Ｂ组疗效明显优于Ａ组。Ｂ组效／价比高于Ａ组。讨论中西医结合手法是治疗基础，结合穴位注射与针刺疗效显著。在治疗基础上训练，可起到事半功倍的效果，但穴位注射和针刺对患儿痛苦较大，故轻症、年龄小者选用Ａ组方法。 Objective To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the two methods in treating children with cerebral palsy and mental retardation. Methods Both of the two methods were based on the technique, with rehabilitation training, A group of cerebrolysin intravenous drip, 30d for a course of treatment; B group of cerebrolysin and other acupuncture points, with acupuncture (scalp acupuncture, body acupuncture), 20d 1 course of treatment. Results The efficacy of group B was better than that of group A. Group B effect / price ratio higher than the A group. Discuss Integrative Medicine is the basis for treatment, combined with acupuncture points acupuncture effect was significant. Training on the basis of treatment, can play a multiplier effect, but acupuncture and acupuncture pain in children with larger, so mild, younger age group A method used.