论文部分内容阅读
储蓄所遭歹徒抢劫,在报警未果的情况下,储蓄员姚丽与之周旋,以较小的损失保护了银行巨额财产,却因“未能与歹徒进行殊死搏斗”而受到开除公职、开除党籍的处分……法院恢复原中国建设银行黑龙江省大庆市分行职员姚丽公职的终审判决下达已半个多月了,但3月17日当她来到原单位要求恢复工作时,仍然得不到答复。一起因歹徒抢劫而引发的事件还没有最终划上句号。 2000年3月20日中国青年报刊登出一篇文章《她是“狗熊”吗?》,3月24日法制日报刊登《为姚丽击鼓鸣冤!》……一石激起千层浪——社会对一个人的生命和另外一些人的财产,把哪一个看得更重?大庆建行3月10日那份《安全保卫责任书》有什么法律依据?“姚丽们”有没有普通公民应具有的紧急避险权……这实在不是一个银行职员的职责问题,而是社会价值尺度的问题。今天,我们已经可以认真地面对、思考和回答这个问题了。
The robbers were robbed by criminals in the absence of the police. Under the circumstance of unsuccessful police reports, the stockbroker Yao Li dealt with the loss with a relatively small sum to protect the bank’s huge property but was expelled from the public service because of “failing to wage a death row against gangsters” Expelled from the party’s disposal ...... The court resumed the original judgment of China Construction Bank branch in Daqing City, Heilongjiang Province, staff Yao Li issued a final judgment more than half a month, but on March 17 when she came to the original unit asked to resume work, No reply. The incident triggered by the gangster robbery has not yet ended. March 20, 2000 China Youth Daily published an article, “She is a bear,” “?”, March 24 Legal Daily published “Yao Ming hit drum unjust!” - Society on a person’s lives and other people’s property, which one to see more weight? Daqing Construction Bank March 10 that share of “security responsibility” What is the legal basis? “” Yao Li who "have There is no ordinary citizen should have the right of emergency avoidance ... ... This is really not a bank employee duty issues, but the issue of social value scale. Today, we have been able to face, think and answer this question seriously.