论文部分内容阅读
本文探讨了与社会科学研究评价相关的三个问题:同行评价一定程度上造成学术研究与现实需要的脱节,因此要在重视和改进同行评价的同时,引入社会评价,对学术成果实行学术共同体和社会大众联合评价;社会科学成果既要重视学术影响力,又要重视决策影响力和社会影响力,要通过改革学术评价机制,引导学者重视社会科学成果的宣传和普及;思想是学术的灵魂,社会科学研究机构要建成思想库,离不开思想者和思想家,要通过改革学术评价机制,在学术殿堂里为思想者留下生存和发展空间。
This paper explores three issues related to the evaluation of social sciences: peer evaluation results in the disjunction between academic research and actual needs to a certain extent. Therefore, we should pay attention to and improve the peer review, introduce social evaluation, Social sciences and social sciences, we should attach importance to academic influence as well as decision-making influence and social influence. We should guide scholars to emphasize the promotion and popularization of social science achievements by reforming academic evaluation mechanisms. Ideology is the soul of scholarship, Social science research institutions to build a think tank, inseparable from thinkers and thinkers, through the reform of academic evaluation mechanism, in the academic hall for thinkers to survive and develop space.