论文部分内容阅读
与法官的自由裁量权相比,起诉裁量权是指检察官在审查起诉过程中,对事实清楚,证据确实充分的犯罪案件,基于自由裁量,酌情决定是否起诉的权力。由于各方面的原因,我国法学理论界对起诉裁量权的研究远不如法官的自由裁量权那样充分。起诉裁量权在刑事诉讼中发挥着前承侦查、后启审判的重要作用,在很大程度上决定着诉讼程序是否继续进行,因此,起诉裁量权具有很高的制度价值,尤其是在司法体制改革的大潮中,研究起诉裁量权制度更具有重要的现实意义和深远的历史意义。目前,我国的起诉裁量权制度存在瑕疵,行使效果不如人意,亟需要进一步改革和完善。
Compared with the discretion of the judge, the prosecutorial discretion refers to the power of the prosecutor to decide whether or not to prosecute a criminal case with a clear fact and sufficient evidence in the course of examining and prosecuting prosecutors. Due to various reasons, the jurisprudence of jurisprudence in our country far less researches the discretion of prosecution than the judge’s discretion. Therefore, prosecutorial discretion has a very high institutional value, especially in the judicial system. However, prosecutorial discretion plays an important role in pre-trial investigation and post-adjudication in criminal proceedings, which determines to a great extent whether the proceedings continue. In the tide of reform, studying the system of prosecutorial discretion has more important and far-reaching historical significance. At present, the prosecutorial discretion system in our country is flawed and the effect of the exercise is unsatisfactory. There is an urgent need for further reform and improvement.