论文部分内容阅读
在社会经济发展过程中,如何处理官民、政企乃至计划和自由的关系,是任何一个国家都极为重视而又难于把握其最佳结合点的问题。在这方面,日本的经验值得研究,尤其是其在经济决策及政策运营过程中的所谓官产学结合做法更令世人瞩目。笔者在进行战后日本产业合理化政策研究的过程中~①,也接触到一些有关材料,本文拟就日本制定实施产业合理化政策中开展的通商产业行政做一实证考察。“通产行政”一词往往被理解为通产省的行政,这一方面是因为通产省在内外商贸、产业等极为广泛的经济领域确实拥有巨大行政管理权限,同时也与日本海内外对通产省的极大关注和过分哄抬不无关系。的确,正如美国学者查默斯·约翰逊的名著《通产省与日本的奇迹》与近年由日本学者编写的大型研究丛书《通商产
In the process of social and economic development, how to handle the relationship between officials and citizens, government and enterprises and even planning and freedom is a question that any country attaches great importance to and can not grasp its best combination point. In this regard, Japan’s experience deserves study, especially its so-called government-industry-university combination in economic decision-making and policy operation. In the process of post-war Japan’s industrial rationalization policy, I also came into contact with some related materials. This paper intends to make an empirical study on the industrial administration of commerce carried out by Japan in formulating and implementing industrial rationalization policies. The term “administration of mass production” is often understood as the administration of the Ministry of International Trade and Development, on the one hand because the Ministry of International Trade and Development has indeed huge administrative powers in the extremely extensive economic fields such as domestic and foreign commerce and trade, and industries. At the same time, Both inside and outside of the province and the Ministry of Public Security great concern and overdraping not unrelated. Indeed, just as the American scholar Chalmers Johnson’s masterpiece, “MITI and Japan’s Miracle,” and the large study series written by Japanese scholars in recent years,