论文部分内容阅读
客户持存折到银行网点存款320元,柜员疏忽大意误输入为32000元。法庭上,营业网点未能利用自身系统或科技优势提供出对自身有利的举证而败诉基本案情2013年1月24日,孤寡老人于某拿着存折到某金融机构营业网点存款320元,柜员疏忽大意误将320元输入为32000元,当时柜员在征得于某的同意后进行了抹账操作,由于机器故障该笔存款的交易记录未能在存折上打印出来,出现了一个空行。于某不会写字,平时取款凭个人名章支取,当天办理业务时于某未携带个人名章,于某请办理业务的客户代签字后在相关凭证上摁了手印。该年6月份于某病故,其内侄到该营业网点要求支取于某2013
Customers hold deposits to the bank outlets deposits 320 yuan, teller negligence imported mistaken for 32,000 yuan. Court, the business outlets failed to use their own systems or technological advantages to provide evidence of their own favor and lose the basic merits January 24, 2013, the widowed old man holding a passbook to a financial institution outlets deposit 320 yuan, teller negligence The mistake was 320 yuan input for the 32,000 yuan, when the teller in the consent of the consent of a wipe operation, due to the failure of the machine transaction records of the deposit failed to print out on the passbook, there is a blank line. In a will not write, withdrawals usually withdraw with a personal name, the same day when a business deal with a personal name is not carrying a business, the client signed a business on behalf of the signature on the handprint. In June of that year, in an accident, its nephew to the business outlets require withdrawal in a 2013