论文部分内容阅读
目的比较分析中西医结合治疗与单纯西药治疗冠心病劳力型心绞痛的疗效,以为今后临床本病的治疗提供参考。方法 114例冠心病合并劳力型心绞痛患者,随机分为中西医结合治疗组(观察组,60例)以及西药治疗组(对照组,54例),对照组给予单硝酸异山梨酯片治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合自制中药汤剂治疗。观察两组疗效。结果观察组显效34例,有效18例,无效8例,总有效率为86.7%,对照组患者显效18例,有效20例,无效为16例,总有效率为70.4%,观察组总有效率明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组均有个别患者有副作用,经对应调节后副作用均消失,所有患者均坚持全程服药。结论中西医结合治疗冠心痛劳力型心绞痛疗效显著,值得临床应用推广。
Objective To compare and analyze the curative effect of integrative medicine and simple western medicine in treating angina pectoris of coronary heart disease in order to provide reference for the clinical treatment of this disease in the future. Methods One hundred and fourteen patients with coronary heart disease complicated with angina pectoris were randomly divided into two groups: control group (60 cases) and western medicine group (control group, 54 cases). The control group was given isosorbide mononitrate tablets. Group based on the control group combined with homemade decoction. The two groups were observed. Results In the observation group, 34 cases were markedly effective, 18 cases were effective, 8 cases were ineffective and the total effective rate was 86.7%. In the control group, 18 cases were markedly effective, 20 cases were effective, 16 cases were ineffective and the total effective rate was 70.4% Significantly higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There are individual patients in both groups have side effects, the corresponding side effects disappeared after the corresponding adjustment, all patients adhere to the whole medication. Conclusion The combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment of coronary heart disease labor angina significant effect, it is worth promoting the clinical application.