论文部分内容阅读
为应对日本的对外扩张,一些晚清官员提出过可分三个类型的“攻日”之策。“速攻”论者对中国军力的骄慢自信,“缓攻”论者对中国军力的改治期待,“佯攻”论者对中国军力的虚势判断,反映的只是“攻日言论”者的中国认识以及由此而形成的心态,各不相同。“遥度而非近察日本”的态度,既使“不得人心”、“贫不可支”成为这些官员对明治维新日本的共同印象,更使甲午战前“人云亦云”、“随意发想”的日本评说,20年徘徊不前、停留于盲人摸象的层面。各类“攻日”对策的提出,均未经过深思熟虑,其被动性、临时性特征显而易见。
In response to Japan’s expansion abroad, some late Qing officials proposed three types of “offensive days.” “Speed Attack ” on the arrogance and self-confidence of the Chinese military, “Slow Attack ” on the expectations of the Chinese military reform, “Femine ” judge on the Chinese military’s Ivorian judgment, only reflects The Chinese understanding of the words attacking Japan and the mentality formed by them are different. “The attitude of” not remoteness to Japan “but” the unpopularity “and” poverty of the poor “became the common impressions of these officials on the Meiji Restoration of Japan, ”,“ Free to miss ”Japan commented, 20 years stagnant, stop at the level of blind people touching the image. All kinds of “attacking Japan ” measures proposed, have not been thoughtful, its passive, temporary features are obvious.