论文部分内容阅读
国际刑事法院试图确立一种超越主权限度的法律秩序,国际刑事法院的司法实践是对传统主权观念的严重冲击,国际刑事法院所签发的对苏丹总统巴希尔的逮捕令,是国际刑事法院与非缔约国发生直接冲突的首起案例,这一冲突本身反映出不同法治模式间的碰撞。由于割裂了苏丹历史与现实的联系,低估了巴希尔总统对苏丹国家转型和社会发展所作出的贡献,国际刑事法院签发对巴希尔的逮捕令,本质上是对正确问题的错误答案。逮捕令短期内不会对巴希尔总统产生实质性影响,但从长远来看,却严重影响他作为国家元首的合法性基础,对苏丹脆弱的国内和平增添了不少变数。苏丹有必要积极寻求有效应对之策,以法治手段推进社会转型和民族国家建构进程。
The International Criminal Court attempts to establish a legal order that goes beyond the limits of sovereignty. The judicial practice of the International Criminal Court is a serious blow to the traditional concept of sovereignty. The arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court against Sudan’s al-Bashir is the result of the International Criminal Court’s The first case of a direct conflict in a non-State party reflects itself as a collision between different models of the rule of law. Owing to the fragmentation of Sudan’s history and reality, it has underestimated President Bashir’s contribution to Sudan’s state transition and social development. The issuance of an arrest warrant against Bashir by the International Criminal Court is essentially the wrong answer to the correct question. The arrest warrant will not materially affect President Al-Bashir in the short term, but in the long run, it seriously affects his legitimacy as head of state and adds many variables to the fragile domestic peace in the Sudan. It is necessary for the Sudan to actively seek effective countermeasures and promote the process of social transformation and nation-state building by means of law and order.