论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验江光荣(2005)提出的心理咨询会谈深度的三维模型,考察对会谈深度采用整体评估法和切割评估法所得结果的差异。方法:对28个样本会谈的情感、个人化和此时此刻三个维度分别进行整体评分,考察三维度的评分与咨询师和当事人对会谈深度评价的关系,并与切割评估法所得结果进行比较。结果:两种方法对三维度的评分存在中度相关(r情感=0.56,P=0.002;r个人化=0.64,P=0.000;r此时此刻=0.63,P=0.000)。两种方法所得到的三个维度与当事人深度评价的关系不尽相同,切割评估法在三维度与当事人的深度评价间没有相关性,而整体评估法在排除了指导性较强的6个会谈后,在情感和此时此刻维度与当事人的深度评价间相关(r情感.深度评价=0.45,P=0.035;r此时此刻.深度评价=0.58,P=0.005),且此时此刻维度对深度评价有一定的预测作用(深度评价=2.419+0.487×此时此刻,R2=0.501)。结论:两种评分方法既存在一致性,也有差异;会谈深度的三维模型存在一定程度的合理性;两种方法得到的结果不尽相同,还需要更多同类研究的探讨。
OBJECTIVE: To test the three-dimensional model of the depth of the counseling talks proposed by Jiang Guangrong (2005) and to examine the differences between the results of the overall evaluation and the cutting assessment adopted in the talks. Methods: The emotion, personalization and the three dimensions of the 28 sample sessions were respectively scored as a whole to examine the relationship between the three-dimensional score and the in-depth evaluation of the consultation by the consultant and the client and compared with the results obtained by the cutting assessment method . Results: There was a moderate correlation between the two methods for the three-dimensional score (r emotion = 0.56, P = 0.002; r personality = 0.64, P = 0.000; r = 0.63 at this moment, P = 0.000). The relationship between the three dimensions obtained by the two methods and the depth evaluation of the parties is not the same. The cutting evaluation method has no correlation between the three dimensions and the depth evaluation of the parties, while the overall evaluation method excludes the six guidance sessions with strong guidance After that, the relationship between the emotion and the present depth of the moment was related to the depth evaluation of the parties (r emotion, depth evaluation = 0.45, P = 0.035; r depth evaluation = 0.58, P = 0.005 at this moment) Depth evaluation has a certain predictive effect (depth evaluation = 2.419 + 0.487 × at this moment, R2 = 0.501). CONCLUSION: The two scoring methods are both consistent and different. The three-dimensional model of the depth of the talks is reasonable to some degree. The results obtained by the two methods are different, and more researches are needed.