案例回放A公司参与一设备项目采购的投标后,对采购代理机构公示的评标结果颇感意外。因为A公司根据现场了解到的各投标单位的报价唱标情况,并结合招标文件的评分标准分析后认为,自己即使不是第一中标候选人,排名也应在前三名之列。因此,A公司看到评标结果后遂提出质疑。代理机构答复质疑称,A公司因为交纳投标保证金出现失误,没有以单位名义提交,而是以个人名义提交,不符合要求,投标文件在资格性检查时就按无效投标处理了。招标文件明确 Case Playback After A company participated in the bidding for the procurement of a project, the result of the evaluation of the procurement agency publicity was quite unexpected. Because A company based on the scene to understand the bidding of the tender unit of the tender situation, combined with the tender documents evaluation criteria that, even if they are not the first successful candidate, the rankings should also be in the top three list. Therefore, A company after the results of the bid evaluation then questioned. The agency replied in reply that Company A did not submit the bid deposit because it failed to pay the bid bond. Instead, it submitted it in the individual’s name and did not meet the requirements. The bidding documents were treated as invalid bidding upon qualification examination. Bidding documents clear